5" x 9-1/2" watercolor on 140 lb. paper |
No! I answered. Absolutely not! I knew that I finally needed to complete his Cityscape Challenge.
His challenge is posted here - to paint and simplify a scene using a random street in San Francisco as a reference - and from the moment I saw the photo I was intrigued by it. One reason for this is because Frank Eber does this kind of scene all of the time in watercolor (see his New York streets here), and his goal and Terry Miura's goal is the same: SIMPLIFY! And both are very successful at it. If you visit their blogs, you too will be the beneficiary of their generously-shared knowledge. And witness to their great art.
Of course knowing is not the same as doing and the most successful parts of this picture were where I actually paid attention and tried to follow their learned advice. In the least successful parts I would not only forget to simplify, but would also forget what medium I was using - I was practically scrubbing the paper in parts, with watercolor! Don't know what came over me, really.
2-5/8" x 9" (lol) |
Excuses, I know. But I can't help myself.
I set up my paper to draw a big swath of buildings on the side, and decided, for the composition, and to humanize the picture, to place a man crossing the street on the page. With the buildings, though, I really lost it - simplicity out the window (er, out all of the windows.) So I sat staring at the completed piece, not really satisfied, and suddenly I saw two much better pictures were I to simply to cut the page vertically, just so. And that's what I did. On the right is the other picture, cut from the left. So that the first picture that you saw on the left, was on the right, and the second picture that you see on the right was on the left, capisce?
So that's about it. No poetry, no witticisms, nothing particularly clever to say today. Sorry about that. This picture left me high and dry. And I had to meet that deadline. If 99% is simply showing up, at least I did that. And I left having learned a thing or two.
'Till next time..
I'm very impressed! It appears to me that you really did simplify - nice loose drawing/brushstrokes.
ReplyDeleteAwesome paintings! Really.
ReplyDeleteWell they both are beautiful, Dan . . . no "crashing and burning" here! I like the way you've simplified . . . it's just right! And don't get ME started on the cars!! They are great!! They are marvelous! Beautiful work. Can't wait to see your acrylics . . . I am learning (struggling with :-) them, too!!
ReplyDeleteGreat work Dan, I looked at the challenge a week or so ago and decided it extremely difficult. Well done!
ReplyDeleteI love the way you saved this....very very nice results.
ReplyDeleteThese 2 are certainly loose and you have done far more than just turn up!
ReplyDeleteSimplification is also very hard for me. You did a wonderful job with this ... the cars, the buildings, even the man! Good for you!!! nancy
ReplyDeleteCapisce Dan. I like both. They do not look overly detailed; they look terrific. Cityscapes are such fun; they invite the loose handling of the paint. It's the vigor of urban life I think.
ReplyDeleteHello Dan,
ReplyDeleteVery nice painting/paintings. The problem is always what to simplify. What to keep and what to loose.
Thank you for the links.
Fantastic!
Stew.
stewcrowther.wordpress.com
_________________________
Capisce. I love reading about the thought and process behind your work.
ReplyDeleteMan, I love that man on the right--er--left. I do want to pick him up like a puzzle piece and see how he looks with the rest of the painting.
ReplyDeleteI've been following (from a distance) Terry Miura's blog about simplifying, and your painting is wonderful. I considered trying it but I ran out of time.
Glad that you did not run out of time!!
ReplyDeleteI think it is fabulous, Dan! especially how you cropped it! And thanks for the link to Terry Miura's site. Looks wonderful and I can't wait to check it out more thoroughly. I've already joined his mailing list! I think I went to Frank Eber's site from a link you gave before too, and after going there I did a quick city sketch in my sketchbook. It was small and I decided part way through that I didn't really want to finish it, but instead I just simplified. It surprised me how much I liked it!
ReplyDeleteAwesome drawings Dan. I love the use of colors and the vagueness in it, giving a lot of room for imagination but making sure that you're not lost. =) Fantastic package!
ReplyDeleteOne of the best things you've done! Love this!
ReplyDeleteHi Dan, Congratulations on participating in the challenge! It was fun seeing your posting on Terry's blog (ooo! there's Dan! I know that artist!) I particularly like how your paint dances across the paper; masterful!
ReplyDeleteI really have to do one of these challenges...looks like fun! I love both paintings...you did a great job! I especially love the cars!
ReplyDeleteYour first picture (the one on the left that was originally on the right), is amazing. It's perfect, balanced, it conveys a real atmosphere. You've become really awesome at watercolor, I'm awed!
ReplyDeleteAlso, I love your green series very much, for the same reasons, and the poetry (inside and outside the pictures!).
Gorgeous. I like your long this format. It's rare to see alternative paper sizes with watercolour. Very refreshing.
ReplyDeleteKeep your paints wet!
Fantastic work Dan! Congrats on finishing.
ReplyDeleteWell I think you did a very successful painting, and it looks fantastic even though you cut it almost in half... But a lot of great pictures are created that way (parts look fantastic on their own). And I have to say you did a smashing job on the cars, I just cant draw or paint them, they are one of the very hardest things to put on papper for me.
ReplyDeleteGreat piece Dan!!!
I hope all is well down in FL, cheers
Mari
Wow, that car fender with tail lights in your lower right corner is masterfully painted!
ReplyDeleteKeep going...
They both look great! I haven't been brave enough yet to try painting a street scene in watercolour!
ReplyDeleteThank you all so much. It is nice to receive so many wonderful comments on a painting (paintings?) I was so unsure about.
ReplyDelete